Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 40 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
SOC-1B Essay
SOC-1B Essay
Criteria Ratings Pts
Introduction of the Topic
Provide an introduction to the phenomenon you will be discussing (12 points)
threshold: pts
12 to >10.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
8 to >7.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
7 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
pts
12 pts
--
First Stance
Provide First Stance of your topic as supported by scholarly / peer-reviewed sources; take into consideration the major theoretical perspectives supporting / refuting these arguments (Structural / Functional Theory; Conflict Theory; Symbolic Interactionist Theory) (12 points)
threshold: pts
12 to >10.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
8 to >7.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
7 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
pts
12 pts
--
Opposite Stance
Provide opposing stance of your topic as supported by scholarly / peer-reviewed sources; take into consideration the major theoretical perspectives supporting / refuting these arguments (Structural / Functional Theory; Conflict Theory; Symbolic Interactionist Theory) (12 points)
threshold: pts
12 to >10.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
8 to >7.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
7 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
pts
12 pts
--
Justify your stance
Based on the presentation of each argument for your topic, convince the reader why the stance that you choose to endorse is the best (12 points)
threshold: pts
12 to >10.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
8 to >7.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
7 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
pts
12 pts
--
Support / Citation
Substantiated point of view with scholarly / peer-reviewed as an in text citation using a minimum of 5 scholarly / peer-reviewed sources AND Reference page matches in text citation and vice versa (12 points)
threshold: pts
12 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
10 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
8 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
6 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
0 pts
None
No support
pts
12 pts
--
Introduction & Conclusion Flow
The introduction provides an overview of the topic, it is clear, logical, flows, and the last sentence outlines what will be discussed in the paper and the conclusion summarizes the main points of the paper (5 points)
threshold: pts
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
3 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
2 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
0 pts
None
No support
pts
5 pts
--
Formatting - APA 6th ed
The paper—including the title page, reference page, formatted using APA 6th edition. The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white space (5 points)
threshold: pts
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
3 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
2 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
0 pts
None
No support
pts
5 pts
--
Grammar
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct (5 points)
threshold: pts
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates an unusually sharp insight into the material at a mastery level (100% to 90% of point value)
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets Expectations: Demonstrates better than average performance and above the minimum requirements although more development is still need for mastery (90% to 80% of point value)
3 pts
Approaches Expectations
Approaches Expectations: Demonstrates a satisfactory comprehension of the subject matter at a minimum requirement (80% to 70% of point value)
2 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations: Significant improvement is needed in one or more areas (60% to 0% of point value)
0 pts
None
No support
pts
5 pts
--
SOC-1B SLO3

SOC-1B SLO3: Support a position regarding a social problem using a logical argument and evidence.

threshold: 52.25 pts
5 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
pts
0 pts
--
Total Points: 75 out of 75